Ilhan Omar home in DC was rated early this morning by the DOJ. N

GiggleMugs :
Why wait for a pandemic to start questioning things?

The problem I have with this story is that it smacks of political witch-hunt.
DOJ has already investigated so many of trump's perceived enemies.
This is happening in October.
Minnesota went bad for trump last January --looks like he is trying to exact revenge for that.

Sophos3 :
Because I was a full-time employee who was raising a child and doing all the home and financial management on my own! I didn't have time to breathe!

GiggleMugs :
So, the pandemic freed up some time? I am not getting the synchronicity of begining to question things because of the pandemic versus before hand. Both situations seem stressful enough.

Sophos3 : Good grief.

Sophos3 :
Nope! Some of the most investigative reporters are on X. They are not always right, but it is info you do not get on the news. You can write very strong opinions, but are not willing to read? There is also another post above that explains her family history which you also probably opted not to read. I am all about digging for the truth! This is more important than a switch on a birthdate and Americans deserve to know all the facts and not rely on MSM, WAPO, NYT, etc. This is why we are in the situation we are in and our current administration is trying their best to solve it!

Sophos3 :
No, retirement freed up my time after working for 50 years! I now realize, after Covid, how 'we the people' can be!

GiggleMugs :
I read, just not Twitter. People complain about fake news and it is crawling with it. That and bots, malware, data harvesting, etc. Not to mention a CEO who tauts free speech yet is very trigger happy with the delete button. That and he has multiple accounts and cheers himself on. No, I prefer to collect my data from actual sources like any of these;
reuters.com
apnews.com
www.allsides.com
adfontesmedia.com
mediabiasfactcheck.com
csmonitor.com
c-span.org
scottsimon.com
newsnationnow.com
bloomberg.com
thehill.com
pbs.org
Then if I see a story that I think I would like to look into more I hit these;
nih.gov
nasa.gov
ourworldindata.org
who.int
pewresearch.org
thearda.com
worldvaluessurvey.org
opensecrets.org
fec.gov
govtrack.us
transparency.org
acleddata.com
worldbank.org
un.org
uu.se
stlouisfed.org
sec.gov
yahoo.com
imf.org
archive.org
thepaperboy.com
loc.gov
cia.gov
www.courtlistener.com
law.justia.com/cases
google.com
case.law
govinfo.gov
supremecourt.gov

Well, I guess you do read! Why not look at an opposing view and apply your critical thinking skills? Some are not that radical!

GiggleMugs :
I have. What's funny is, I don't have a side. Both parties are ********s. No one's a savior in silver armor coming to save the day. Our job is simple enough, if we don't like the **** sandwich being served we vote in a different menu. The current administration is a lot of talk one way while doing the opposite. While you are worried about this, the commander and chief is sundowning and posting this.
truthsocial.com/@rea lDonaldTrump/1174353 56165640404truthsocial.com/@rea lDonaldTrump/1174370 94956438218

GiggleMugs : Sophos does that. Better than most.
Hard for me and I suspect you.

Chow :

sebastian2 : Come on...he's just trolling Giggles.

kingwooddiscgolf :
I cant even figure out how you can come up with that.

sebastian2 :
Research