Paxton is lying again. It was only thirty days and he didn't hav
Paxton is lying again. It was only thirty days and he didn't hav
Joined:
X days ago
# Posts:
X,XXX
Contributor Points:
X
Replies:
Both parties think negative campaigning & character assassination is impressing voters. I call BS! Tell me what you will do that's positive! Cut taxes! Tough on crime!
Unknown and wmubronco + 2 more reacted
Is this about the case where the jury did not convict the accused, and then the victim said he did not want to testify in a second trial? If it is the Judge's decision was for 60 days and the 30 days was actually the Sheriff's jail policy to reward good behavior. It also looks like the judge could have sentenced the person to a year in prison. Is the sentence was so offensive why is the judge not being held accountable? Do people think Paxton was the judge?
lynnie0524, BooBear and sweetie + 8 more reacted |
|
I think it's Telarico doing the lying. He's got his facts wrong.
#msg6018820FeralHermit : I think it's Telarico doing the lying. He's got his facts wrong.
#msg6018899NeenaC0629 : Paxton is as dirty as it gets and y'all still find faults in our little middle school teacher lmao hes too FWEEAKYYYYYYYYY
It is probably just say vote who you want to rather than to add your blatant biased lies about the candidates
|
|
#msg6018908JerryJustice : If you want Democrat policies vote for Talarico,if you want conservative policies vote Paxton.It is that simple.
If it is, vote Paxton.
If it is, vote Paxton.
If it is, vote Paxton.
If it is, vote Paxton.
#msg6018672Both parties think negative campaigning & character assassination is impressing voters. I call BS!
It is time to remind voters how corrupt Paxton is.
Tie him to trump-who gets crazier by the day.
Court-ordered judgment - taxpayers pay
The Eight Whistleblowers
The Paxton Files/The Eight Whistleblowers
What They Did
In October 2020, eight of Ken Paxton's most senior staff members - not one or two disgruntled employees, but the entire senior leadership of the office - simultaneously filed a criminal complaint with federal authorities. They alleged that Paxton had committed bribery and abused his office to benefit Austin real estate developer and campaign donor Nate Paul. What Happened to Them
After reporting their boss to the FBI, the whistleblowers were fired or forced to resign from the Attorney General's office. This is the textbook definition of whistleblower retaliation: public servants who reported alleged criminal conduct by their superior were punished for doing so. The Lawsuit
Four of the eight whistleblowers filed suit under the Texas Whistleblower Act, which protects public employees who report violations of law by their employers. The case proceeded through Travis County courts. The Verdict
In April 2025, a Travis County District Court judge ruled that the Attorney General's office had violated the Texas Whistleblower Act by terminating the employees who reported Paxton. The court awarded $6.6 million in damages. Paxton initially appealed but dropped the appeal in July 2025, locking in the taxpayer-funded payment. Who Pays
Texas taxpayers. The $6.6 million judgment is paid from public funds - not from Paxton personally. Taxpayers are footing the bill because a court found that the state's top law enforcement officer retaliated against the employees who tried to hold him accountable. That money could have funded college scholarships, food bank operations, additional prosecutors, or victim services. ken-paxton.com/topic s/whistleblowers/
RolloTomaso, Spike and Etarver reacted The Eight Whistleblowers
The Paxton Files/The Eight Whistleblowers
What They Did
In October 2020, eight of Ken Paxton's most senior staff members - not one or two disgruntled employees, but the entire senior leadership of the office - simultaneously filed a criminal complaint with federal authorities. They alleged that Paxton had committed bribery and abused his office to benefit Austin real estate developer and campaign donor Nate Paul.
After reporting their boss to the FBI, the whistleblowers were fired or forced to resign from the Attorney General's office. This is the textbook definition of whistleblower retaliation: public servants who reported alleged criminal conduct by their superior were punished for doing so.
Four of the eight whistleblowers filed suit under the Texas Whistleblower Act, which protects public employees who report violations of law by their employers. The case proceeded through Travis County courts.
In April 2025, a Travis County District Court judge ruled that the Attorney General's office had violated the Texas Whistleblower Act by terminating the employees who reported Paxton. The court awarded $6.6 million in damages. Paxton initially appealed but dropped the appeal in July 2025, locking in the taxpayer-funded payment.
Texas taxpayers. The $6.6 million judgment is paid from public funds - not from Paxton personally. Taxpayers are footing the bill because a court found that the state's top law enforcement officer retaliated against the employees who tried to hold him accountable. That money could have funded college scholarships, food bank operations, additional prosecutors, or victim services.
We've seen Paxton's true colors-- hes shown his fraudulent, lying, pedophile, adulterous activities. He also has denied several women the right to have a fetus removed that almost killed the mothers. One had to life flighted to another state. 2 died. And yes, I'm sure. He has no medical knowledge to make these decisions. Not for me, not for any female. No matter your politics.
JerryJustice, ExCTGuyInTX and Kingwoodgypsy reacted Views: 4,316
# Replies: 121


















