At the protests now

Spork :
Exactly. People here illegally do NOT have the full constitutional backing Only citizens do or those here on legal visa They don't get jury trials Like if we went to China do you think if we broke their laws our constitutional protections follow? No. They removed Gov 101 from high school. And now we get a population of people they don't know laws or how they work

ZMAN :
You can't trust google. Their source is the aclu

Sisyphus : The Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam case addressed the constitutionality of expedited removal proceedings, particularly regarding the due process rights of non-citizens and the scope of judicial review.The majority reasoned that habeas corpus, as understood at the time of the Constitution's framing, was primarily a mechanism to challenge unlawful detention, not to seek a specific immigration outcome like asylum or admission to the U.S.I suspect you know this because of its recency. I also suspect you know this because expedited removals have been codified by law since the Clinton era and the core statutory framework has yet to be overturned in legal challenges during the law's 30 year existence.

Chickadee :
Thanks for posting photos & videos.❤️