DH threatened with physical harm by teenagers on Greenbelt.
DH threatened with physical harm by teenagers on Greenbelt.
Joined:
X days ago
# Posts:
X,XXX
Contributor Points:
X
DH threatened with physical harm by teenagers on Greenbelt. My husband wasn't feeling well today and went on a walk on the Greenbelt by Woodland Hills and Kingwood Middle School. There were two kids-- he thinks late middle school, early high school-- on a motorized scooter and a motorized bike. The first time they came by, he ignored them, but the second time they came by, he took a picture of them just cause he gets irritated by people not following the greenbelt rules. Long story short, the kids got super aggressive with him and told him that if he didn't delete it, they would beat the f out of him. They rode away and then came back to threaten to beat him up some more. It shook him up. I'm tempted to post the picture, but I decided not to for the moment. I just thought I'd post it because I think people should know about it.
Joe, Wanderer and SkynetAware + 31 more reacted Replies:
Let's slow down and think a minute before we start posting minors on the internet. Looking at this from the perspective of said minors, they don't know if your Husband is a perv or not; so, they were well within their rights to ask him to delete the photos. He's also lucky no one called the police stating some perv is on the Greenbelts taking photos of minors. Yes, those kids were wrong to speak to him in the manner they did. They were also wrong to have their "motorized vehicles" on the Greenbelts. However, Kingwoodians are always *****ing about them being on the streets. I'm also not sure those things are breaking any Greenbelt rules; however, I also don't know the latest regulations.
StGetoffmylawn1, Cl1974 and Donnawisdom + 4 more reacted
I tend to mind my own business so there is no reason for confrontation
StGetoffmylawn1, MoggiesServant and DogLover25 + 11 more reacted
Agreed. Instead of posting pictures of minors on social media, head over to HPD and speak with the front desk.
HappyDay2016, Unknown and MoggiesServant + 19 more reacted Funnily enough... They threatened him with that too. They said they'll call the cops and say he was a pervert. But that's so messed up because they knew it was about the motorized bikes from jump.
Kingwood kids looking through KDC as we speak seeing how this unfolds…lol
HappyOne, Donnawisdom and StormChaser + 5 more reacted I tend to mind my own business so there is no reason for confrontation
DH threatened with physical harm by teenagers on Greenbelt. My husband wasn't feeling well today and went on a walk on the Greenbelt by Woodland Hills and Kingwood Middle School. There were two kids-- he thinks late middle school, early high school-- on a motorized scooter and a motorized bike. The first time they came by, he ignored them, but the second time they came by, he took a picture of them just cause he gets irritated by people not following the greenbelt rules. Long story short, the kids got super aggressive with him and told him that if he didn't delete it, they would beat the f out of him. They rode away and then came back to threaten to beat him up some more. It shook him up. I'm tempted to post the picture, but I decided not to for the moment. I just thought I'd post it because I think people should know about it.
There is no expectation of privacy on a public greenbelt, and I am glad he did take the photo, especially re the way these kids reacted to your DH. If they accost him again, there is no reason not to call the non emergency number, and report the incident. This Isn't "boys will be boys" behavior, this is threat of bodily harm. These kids need to be taught some serious 'don't do' boundaries, asap.
Oh, no, we went to the police substation over by Wendy's. We filled a report. I forget exactly what the charges were. He has the paperwork, but I think it was assault and threats of bodily violence.
Just one more good reason to carry bear spray. If someone crosses that physical line, it's on.
« Back to Chat
Views: 7,594
# Replies: 176






































