Philosophical Thought Experiment.
Philosophical Thought Experiment.
« BackThis discussion has been locked.
|
by:
6 OP
~ 6 years ago
May 10, '17 7:59pm
|
I have a thought experiment for our radical pro-life fundamentalist Christians.Let's assume there where was one terrorist next to a three year old American child. Would drone bombing the terrorist be permissible if he was using them as a "human shield"? What if that very same terrorist was in the queue at a obstetrician's office and there was a pregnant women with an unborn child. Would drone bombing them still be permissible or is an unborn child even more innocent?Ok, now one more question. What if the woman could get out of the bombing, but she lost the fetus in the process? So the drone bombing only killed the terrorist and the fetus?I'm just trying to understand radical pro-life fundamentalist Christians.Thanks in advance. 4951
* Reactions disabled on political threads.
Replies:
|
11
~ 6 years ago
May 10, '17 9:48pm
|
Dude, troll of the month award, right here. Â Contest over. Â You win. 4951
* Reactions disabled on political threads.
|
8
~ 6 years ago
May 10, '17 10:09pm
|
Removed By Request 4951
* Reactions disabled on political threads.
|
6 OP
~ 6 years ago
May 10, '17 10:13pm
|
I just think it's worth questioning. If the human shield analogy extends to death to children, then the only difference between a moral abortion and immoral one is the death of a terrorist? That's not satisfactory for me. 4951
* Reactions disabled on political threads.
|
16
~ 6 years ago
May 10, '17 10:13pm
|
Why is being against killing babies radical? 4951
* Reactions disabled on political threads.
This discussion has been locked.
« Back to Main PageViews: 38
# Replies: 4