from my understanding of reading the article...if you're reserving space for a tour WHILE YOU ARE PREGNANT, but the tour will take place AFTER THE BABY IS BORN...the unborn child has to be accounted for. it's not as if you have to register an unborn child if you're taking a tour while pregnant.
Taramay is missing the point, or trying to raise a smoke screen. The article is clear on the registration for a future visit. But if an unborn baby is expected to become a baby, in other words if it is already a person who can register in expectation of a future WH visit, then the unborn baby is a person and abortion is killing a person. This policy exposes the argument that an unborn baby isn't a person. This policy proves the Obama admin and WH staff don't believe the convenient argument that an unborn baby isn't a person.
BTW, randomly CAPITALIZING WORDS does not make an ARGUMENT STRONGER.
No, but your post assumed that the info you WROTE (partially in randomly capitalized WORDS) somehow changed the meaning. That's a smoke screen.
There's no conspiracy. There's a conflict of policy within the same organization.
For purposes of WH visits an unborn baby is a person who will one day visit the WH. That person must register. For purposes of making "pro choice" (aka pro abortion) people's argument, an unborn baby isn't a person.
If folks can kill an unborn baby at will because it isn't a person, then how can expectant parents register the baby for a WH visit? It's not a person. It's a "lump of unlivable cells".