So we are supposed to send troups and go in alone? Is anyone else "going in to end this" or is everyone looking to the US, once again, to fight the world's battles? Yes, it is horrible, yes, it should stop, but are we the world's peacekeepers for every issue that "isn't right?" Shoud we really have boots on the ground in every country where we don't like what is going on, when we can't even protect our own borders? There is only so much we can do at a time and only so far we can stretch our own military.
@donnatella: No we shouldn't have to go it alone and I don't think we should be the world police but we could at least take the lead in forming a coalition of countries (which now includes France) that have declaired war on Islamic Terrorism in the world. Since this non-president took office we have lost all gain that we have made in our war on terrorism since 9-11. Terrorists are attacking in countries all over the world.. what better time than now to take the lead in forming that coalition? Our so called "President" won't even call it what it is.. Islamic Terrorism. Someone needs to take the lead and although I know what you are saying and I agree that we shouldn't always have to be the ones to do it, the problem is.. it's only going to get worse until we do something. If we had the leadership that we need in the White House, this could be the best time to form that coalition.
4951